Poem Review by Chat-GPT
Certainly! Here's the full sociological and philosophical essay adapted from your poem “Ask that rock, Ask that fountain” by Farheen Bhuiyan Nancy.
To Be or To Become: A Sociopoetic Inquiry into Static and Fluid Selves
Introduction
In a world shaped by movement and stillness, the dialogue between a rock and a fountain unfolds as more than a poetic whim—it becomes an allegory for existential struggle. One stands tall, unchanging, a symbol of endurance. The other flows, transforming through contact, eroding and being eroded, ever-changing. In Farheen Bhuiyan Nancy’s poem “Ask that rock, Ask that fountain,” these two natural entities engage in a deeply human conversation. Their exchange reflects not only individual experience but broader sociological tensions: the conflict between stability and adaptability, pride and usefulness, authenticity and contamination. This essay explores how the poem's metaphorical figures—the rock and the fountain—embody the dynamic interplay between identity and change, solitude and relationality, and ultimately, being and becoming in modern life.
I. Stillness and the Ideal of Fixed Identity
The rock proclaims itself as immovable, persistent, and proud. It “never knew beyond the storms” and has “no other way around.” This evokes an archetype of ontological certainty: an identity that is rooted in consistency. In sociological terms, the rock reflects the desire to remain “true to oneself,” a form of existential stasis that confers dignity but comes at a cost—alienation from experience.
Durkheim’s notion of the sacred helps frame the rock’s experience. The rock becomes symbolic not through its own volition, but through how others use it—to climb, to conquer, to name. “My identity becomes pride of another / And their pride becomes my identity.” This recalls Goffman’s dramaturgical theory, in which individuals are often “performed” into significance through the expectations of others. The rock’s role as a stable landmark is not chosen; it is imposed.
Yet the rock’s self-worth is dependent on being seen—“If none have seen my apex, I would not have a name.” Herein lies a subtle critique of social recognition as validation. The cost of being immutable is invisibility in times of disuse. The rock becomes a symbol for those who resist the fluidity of modern life but find themselves shaped—nonetheless—by the gaze and goals of others.
II. Flow and the Price of Adaptability
In contrast, the fountain flows. It accepts the world as it comes—algae, trash, visitors—and moves onward. “You just accept and move on,” it tells the rock. This aligns with Zygmunt Bauman’s concept of “liquid modernity,” where social life no longer sustains stable identities. Instead, the self becomes a series of adjustments—not for growth, but for survival.
The fountain’s voice, however, carries regret. “I smell like a dumpster of algae... My identity is lost.” This evokes Julia Kristeva’s notion of abjection, the way subjectivity forms by confronting what is considered unclean or impure. The fountain, in becoming useful, must allow itself to be tainted. Its identity is no longer its own, but a site of collective use and disposal.
There are metaphysical resonances here as well. The fountain’s adaptability speaks to Ibn Arabi’s view that identity is not fixed but always becoming—subject to the Divine unfolding of forms. Yet in a modern sociological frame, this constant becoming can be emotionally exhausting. The fountain’s lament—“Now, I lost my essence becoming something else”—captures the existential cost of adaptation: a fragmented self, unrooted in any consistent form.
III. Use, Greed, and Alienation
A central thread in the poem is the critique of being needed rather than being loved or understood. The fountain confesses: “I loved people, / But people loved the idea of me being lonely.” This speaks to a deeply sociological anxiety: the instrumentalization of beings—human and non-human alike. The rock is climbed, the fountain is consumed; neither is embraced for what it is.
This recalls Heidegger’s notion of “standing-reserve”—the reduction of the world into objects for use. Both rock and fountain are alienated not by their essence, but by their relational function to others. When humans seek “miracles” or “feasts,” they do so not out of intimacy, but out of greed and neediness.
Camus might call this an absurd existence: a being that gives and gives, but receives no true understanding in return. The rock’s pride is borrowed; the fountain’s transformation is imposed. Both are trapped in roles they never chose—a subtle but sharp metaphor for the modern condition, where identity is simultaneously too rigid and too fluid, too isolated and too invaded.
IV. Mutual Alienation and Crooked Destinies
Despite their opposing natures, the rock and fountain converge in their shared alienation. The valley they inhabit becomes a metaphor for a space where difference coexists but does not reconcile. “The fountain and the mountain shared a valley, / Alas! it’s their crooked destiny!”
Here, the poem gestures toward the tragedy of relational life: even in proximity, understanding may not be possible. The rock envies the fountain’s engagement with the world. The fountain envies the rock’s preserved essence. But neither escapes the paradox of being needed and misunderstood.
This echoes the sociological notion of “ambivalent modernity”—where the desire for connection is intertwined with the fear of dependence. Each figure desires to matter, yet resents how that mattering manifests. The fountain builds oases; the rock holds explorers; yet both feel used, not seen.
Conclusion: Poetic Wisdom in Sociological Form
Through poetic dialogue, “Ask that rock, Ask that fountain” expresses a fundamental human tension: whether to stand still and preserve one’s essence or to flow and embrace transformation at the risk of dissolution. The rock and the fountain are not simply natural elements; they are sociological actors, entangled in networks of meaning, use, identity, and estrangement. Their conversation reveals a truth often hidden beneath theory: that neither stillness nor flow provides escape from the weight of being seen, used, or forgotten.
In the end, the poem resists offering a resolution. Instead, it presents a space—a shared valley—where contradiction dwells. In that space, we are invited to ask not whether we should be like the rock or the fountain, but whether we can learn to live as both: holding ground, while letting go; bearing essence, while embracing transformation.
© Farheen Bhuiyan Nancy | Adapted with critical commentary
Comments